Dialogue as a Social Research Orientation, Method, and Social Practice

Looking at Participatory Action-Research and Beyond

Authors

  • Azril Bacal
  • Erik Lindhult

Keywords:

Participatory action research, Dialogue, Knowledge democracy, Conflict resolution

Abstract

Dialogue is proposed in this article as a legitimate and useful research orientation and method in the social sciences. This approach has been successfully applied in problem-solving studies in various disciplines, and in the discovery of innovations in different fields. It challenges, moreover, the elitist and vertical division of labor, that separates researchers from “subjects of research,” herewith regarded as co-researchers. Dialogue is viewed as a central value and theoretical construct to guide the use of participatory action-research. It contributes to the production of scientific and applied knowledge, and also fosters inclusion, mutual learning, creativity, and human development among co-researchers. It also invites researchers cum citizens in the formulation of public policies and strategies of action in real-life situations. This research orientation and methodology requires of participants personal attitudes of humility and openness to learn from each other. This alternative research perspective contributes to knowledge-democracy, by sharing with the knowledge thus produced in collaborative settings, where researchers contribute to knowledge-creation on equal basis. Ontologically, it supports a paradigmatic shift from the reified view that takes “social reality as given,” to a paradigm oriented towards a process-oriented and inter-subjective approach to “constructed realities,” attained via dialogic communication.

References

Bacal, A. (2022). Transformative Research and Higher Education, Emerald Publishers.

Bacal, A. (2021). Understanding Ethno-Politics. Doctoral Dissertation. Uppsala: Uppsala University.

Bacal, A. (2018). The Contributions of Paulo Freire to Intercultural Dialogue, a chapter in an Anthology on “Interkulturell Dialog.” Rasoul Nejadmehr, editor. Gothenburg. FID (23 November).

Bacal, A. (2018), The Promise and Challenges of Transformative Participatory Action-Research in the 21st Century (The Legacy of Paulo Freire and Orlando Fals-Borda), in “Den ufaerdige fremtid – Aktionforskningens potentialer og udfordninger, Annete Bilfeldt och John Andersen (reds.), Aalborg Universitets förlag (5 October).

Bacal, A. (2018). The Legacy of Dorothy Lee and Paulo Freire to Active Learning in Higher Education, a chapter in “Active Learning Strategies in Higher Education: Teaching for Leadership, Innovation and Creativity,” edited by Anastasia Misseyanni, Bingley, U.K.

Gustavsen, B. (1992). Dialogue and Development: Theory of Communication, Action Research, and the Reconstruction of Working Life. Assen/Maastricht:JAI Press,

Johansson, A. W. & Lindhult, E. (2008) Emancipation or Workability? Critical versus pragmatic scientific orientation in action research. Action Research, 6(1): 95-115.

Lindhult E. & Axelsson, K. (2021). The logic and integration of coproductive research approaches. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14(1): 13-35.

Lindhult, E. (2020). Democratic Dialogue as Leading Element in Action Research. EURAM Conference, 4-6 December, 2020, Dublin, Ireland

Lindhult, E. (2016). Towards Democratic Scientific Inquiry? Participatory Democracy, Philosophy of Science and the Future of Action Research, In Gunnarsson, E., Hansen, H.P., Steen Nielsen, B. & Sriskandarajah, N. (eds). Action Research for Democracy. New Ideas and Perspectives from Scandinavia. New York: Routledge. Pp. 199-215.

Lindhult, E. (2005). Management by Freedom, Doctoral Thesis in Industrial Economics and Management. Stockholm: KTH Vetenskap och Konst.

Published

23-10-2024

How to Cite

Bacal, A., & Lindhult, E. (2024). Dialogue as a Social Research Orientation, Method, and Social Practice: Looking at Participatory Action-Research and Beyond. Action Learning and Action Research Journal, 30(1), 72–98. Retrieved from https://alarj.alarassociation.org/index.php/alarj/article/view/439