Seeing research problems as trees: Analysing data through a locally led participatory tree exercise

Authors

  • Rebecca Nalwanga Tamusuza The University of Melbourne

Keywords:

Participatory Tree Exercise, Co-generative Knowledge Production, Alternative Development, Disability Inclusion, Sub-Saharan Africa, Locally Led Analysis

Abstract

Although research participants are invited to share their experiences during the data collection stage, conventional research often excludes them from the data analysis process. The tendency to position external researchers as ‘experts imparting knowledge’ and local participants as ‘novices attaining knowledge’, undermines the varied ways in which locally situated participants are experts in their day-to-day lives. In my exploration of the sensitive and complex exclusion of young people with disability in Uganda, I adopted a locally led participatory tree exercise, where research participants were invited to contribute to the data analysis process. Through drawing on the analogy of a problem tree and solution tree, this research situates participants at the grassroots level as experts in their analysis of the intertwined social, economic and political dimensions of disability in Uganda. Inviting participants into the data analysis process counters the unequal power relations that tend to focus on external ‘experts’ in the production of knowledge.

References

Barnes, C., Mercer, G. & Shakespeare, T. (2010) The social model of disability. In Giddens, A. & Sutton, P. (Eds.) Sociology: introductory readings, Routledge, pp. 161–167.

Brown, L.D., Bammer, G., Batliwala, S. & Kunreuther, F. (2003) Framing practice-research engagement for democratizing knowledge. Action Research 1 (1), 81–102.

Byrne, M.M. (2001) Understanding life experiences through a phenomenological approach to research. AORN journal, 73 (4), 830-832.

Connell, R. (2011) Southern bodies and disability: Re-thinking concepts. Third World Quarterly 32 (8), 1369–1381. Available from https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2011.614799.

Clark, T. (2008) `We’re over-researched here!’: Exploring accounts of research fatigue within qualitative research engagements. Sociology, 42 (5), 953–970. Available from https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508094573.

Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (2005) The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.) The Sage handbook of qualitative research, pp. 1–32.

Dick, B. (2001) Action research: Action and research. University Press, 21-27. Available from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245175378_Action_research_action_and_research_On_line.

Dilthey, W. & Jameson, F. (1972) The rise of hermeneutics. New Literary History, 3 (2), 229–244. Available from https://doi.org/10.2307/468313.

Emery, M. (1994) The search conference: State of the art. Center for Continuing Education, Australian National University.

Freire, P. (2000) Pedagogy of the oppressed. In Beck, J., Jenks, C., Keddie, N. & Young M.F.D. (Eds.) Toward a sociology of education, pp. 374–386.

Freire, P. (2002) Education for critical consciousness. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Geertz, C. (1973) The interpretation of cultures. New York, Basic Books.

Geertz, C. (2008) Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In Oakes, T. & Price, P.L. (Eds.) The cultural geography reader, pp. 41–51.

Government of Uganda. & UNICEF. (2019) Situation Analysis of children in Uganda. Available from https://www.unicef.org/uganda/search?force=0&query=situational+analysis+of+children [Accessed 18th July 2024].

Grech, S. & Soldatic, K. (2016) Disability in the global south: The critical handbook. Springer International Publishing. Available from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42488-0 [Accessed 10th June 2024].

Gustavsen, B. (2008) Action research, practical challenges and the formation of theory. Action Research, 6 (4), 421–437.

Hall, B. (1975) Participatory research: An approach for change. Convergence, 8 (2) 1–24.

Hennink, M., Bailey, A. and Hutter, I. (2020) Qualitative research methods. United Kingdom, Sage.

Herheim, R., Werler, T. & Hauge, K.H. (2022) Lived democracy in education (Vol. 2). Routledge.

Knibbe, K. & Versteeg, P. (2008) Assessing phenomenology in anthropology: Lessons from the study of religion and experience. Critique of Anthropology, 28 (1) 47–62.

Kolucki, B., & Lemish, D. (2011) Communicating with children: Principles and practices to nurture, inspire, excite, educate and heal. UNICEF, 1-96 Available from https://www.academia.edu/download/53657361/Communicating_with_children.pdf.

Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2014) Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. SAGE Publications.

Kwesiga, E., Wamajji, R., Mwesigye, G. & Mubangizi, P. (2019) State of the youth report in Uganda: Assessing government’s investment in young people. Kampala, Uganda, Centre for Policy Analysis.

Latour, B. (1987) Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Massachusetts, Harvard University Press.

Leach, E.R. (1991) An anthropologist’s reflections on a social survey 1967. Cambridge, Archive Centre King’s College.

Lewin, K. (2007) Introduction to action research. Sage.

Liebenberg, L. (2018) Thinking critically about photovoice: Achieving empowerment and social change. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17 (1) 1–9. Available from https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918757631 [Accessed 05th July 2023].

Magnus, E., Knudtsen, M.S., Wist, G., Weiss, D. & Lillefjell, M. (2016) The search conference as a method in planning community health promotion actions. Journal of Public Health Research, 5 (2). Available from https://doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2016.621 [Accessed 05th July 2022].

Mayoux, L. (2003) Thinking it through: Using diagrams in impact assessment. Enterprise Development Impact Assessment Information Service Enterprise, United Kingdom.

Mayoux, L. (2006) Quantitative, qualitative or participatory? Which method, for what and when. Doing Development Research, 1, 115–129.

Mayoux, L. (2022) Action trees. Game change network. Available from https://gamechangenetwork.org/empowerment-methodology/diagrams/action-trees/ [Accessed 24th February 2025].

Moore, S.F. (1987) Explaining the present: Theoretical dilemmas in processual ethnography. American Ethnological Society, 14 (4), 727–736. Available from https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1525/ae.1987.14.4.02a00080?casa_token=BaVococEhycAAAAA%3AYz8kitBkRqxRzeNTOXJGyG0tv0Zb5srL5Njnn6X3ioddGc5ZiX5oCacBJoo-18O5UqJb0BkKwSlNynYP [Accessed 4th March 2024].

Nalwanga, R. (2023) UNIMELB_NALWANGA-Rebecca_VYT-Video-Submission-2023.mp4. The University of Melbourne. Media. Available from https://figshare.unimelb.edu.au/articles/media/UNIMELB_NALWANGA-Rebecca_VYT-Video-Submission-2023_mp4_UNIMELB_NALWANGA-Rebecca_VYT-Voiceover_Script-2023_mp4_UNIMELB_NALWANGA-Rebecca_VYT-Submission-Checklist2023_mp4/23537787?backTo=%2Fcollections%2FVYT_2023%2F6713136&file=41281632 [Accessed 3rd March 2025].

Olkin, R. (2001) What psychotherapists should know about disability. New York, Guilford Press.

Ryle, G. (1968a) The thinking of thoughts. (No. 18). Saskatoon, University of Saskatchewan

Ryle, G. (1968b) Thinking and reflecting. Cambridge, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 1, 210–226

Shakespeare, T. (2017) Disability: The basics. London, Routledge.

Shih, C.F. (2009) Academic colonialism and the struggle for Indigenous knowledge systems in Taiwan. Social Alternatives, 29 (1), 44–47.

Sutton, B. (1993) The rationale for qualitative research: A review of principles and theoretical foundations. The Library Quarterly, 63 (4), 411–430.

Tushemereirwe, W.K. (2001) A century of banana research and development in Uganda, 1898-1998. Uganda Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6 (1), 27–36. Available from http://journal.naro.go.ug/index.php/ujas/article/view/419 [Accessed 12th March 2025].

Uganda Bureau of Statistics. (2017) Education: A means for population transformation: Thematic series: Based on the National Population and Housing Census 2014. Uganda Bureau of Statistics.

Uganda Bureau of Statistics. (2018) 2018 statistical abstract. Uganda Bureau of Statistics. Available from https://www.ubos.org/wp-content/uploads/publications/05_2019STATISTICAL_ABSTRACT_2018.pdf [Accessed 03rd March 2023].

Wang, C. & Burris, M.A. (1997) Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24 (3), 369–387. Available from https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/67790/10.1177_109019819702400309.pdf?sequence=2 [Accessed 16th January 2025]

Wang, C.C., Cash, J.L. & Powers, L.S. (2000) Who knows the streets as well as the homeless? Promoting personal and community action through photovoice. Health Promotion Practice 1 (1), 81–89. Available from https://joycebredesen.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/who-knows-the-streets-as-well-as-the-homeless.pdf [Accessed 05th May 2023].

Published

27-10-2025

How to Cite

Nalwanga Tamusuza, R. (2025). Seeing research problems as trees: Analysing data through a locally led participatory tree exercise. Action Learning and Action Research Journal, 31(1), 28–58. Retrieved from https://alarj.alarassociation.org/index.php/alarj/article/view/477