Systemic innovation and industry transformation
Exploring ways to innovate systemically
Parole chiave:
Systemic, innovation, systems thinking, industry transformation, innovation center, systemic innovation, industry 4.0, industry 5.0Abstract
Systemic innovation as a concept and theory is still undeveloped for understanding and managing innovation. By a focus on processes where actors innovate systemically, where systems are seen as something constructed by innovators rather than given in reality, systemic innovation adds to leading approaches to managing innovation, like open innovation, triple helix, as well as innovation system and ecosystem, with potentials to be developed into a new paradigm in innovation studies and innovation management. Through conceptual development, literature review and empirical study at three industrial innovation centers focused on industry transformation, a model for systemic innovation is developed. The model aims to contribute to theory of systemic innovation as well as be potential guide for practitioners in innovating systemically.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Ackoff, R. (1983). An Interactive View of Rationality. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 34 (8), p.719-722.
Amit, R. & Zott, C. (2021). Business model innovation strategy. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley
Breque, M., De Nul, L., & Petridis, A. (2021). Industry 5.0: towards a sustainable, human-centric and resilient European industry. Luxembourg, LU: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation.
Cabrera, D. (2006). Systems thinking. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Cabrera, D., Colosi, L., & Lobdell, C. (2008). Systems thinking. Evaluation and Program Planning, 31(3), 299–310.
Cabrera, D., & Colosi, L. (2008). Distinctions, systems, relationships, and perspectives (DSRP): A theory of thinking and of things. Evaluation and Program Planning, 31(3), 311-317.
Checkland, P. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
Checkland, P., Poulter, J. (2006). Learning for Action. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Checkland P and Scholes J (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Wiley, Chichester.
Córdoba, J.-R. & Midgley, G. (2008). Beyond organisational agendas: using boundary critique to facilitate the inclusion of societal concerns in information systems planning. European Journal of Information Systems. 17(2): 125-142.
Den Ouden, E. (2012). Innovation Design: Creating Value for People, Organizations and Society. Springer-Verlag London.
Flood, R. L., & Jackson, M. C. (1991). Creative problem solving: Total systems intervention. Chichester: Wiley.
Jackson, M. C. (2006). Creative Holism: A Critical Systems Approach to Complex Problem Situations. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 23: 647-657.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford U P.
Lindhult, E. (2022). “Systemic Innovation”, in Routledge Handbook of Systems Thinking, (eds. D. Cabrera, L. Cabrera, G. Midgley). Routledge. (forthcoming).
Lindhult E. & Axelsson, K. (2021). The logic and integration of coproductive research approaches. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14(1): 13-35.
Lindhult, E. & Nygren, C. (2018). Fuzzy front end of business model innovation. Proceedings of The XIX ISPIM Innovation Conference, 17-20 June 2018, Stockholm, Sweden.
Midgley, G. (2000). Systemic intervention: philosophy, methodology, and practice. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
Lundvall, B.-Å. (2010). National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: NBN International.
Midgley, G. (2003). Systems thinking, Vols. I– IV. London: Sage.
Midgley, G (2008). Response to paper ‘‘Systems thinking’’ by D. Cabrera et al.: The unification of systems thinking: Is there gold at the end of the rainbow? Evaluation and Program Planning, 31(3): 317–321.
Midgley, G. & Lindhult, E. (2021). A systems perspective on systemic innovation. Systems research and behavioral science. 38(5): 635-670.
Svensson, L., Ellström, P-E. & Brulin, G. (2007). Introduction – on Interactive Research. International Journal of Action Research, 3(3): 233-249.
Takey, S. M., & Carvalho, M. M. (2016). Fuzzy front end of systemic innovations: A conceptual framework based on a systematic literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 111: 97–109.
Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy. 15(6): 285–305.
Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Designing your future business model: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43, 216-226.
Zott, C., Amit, R. & Massa, L. (2011). The Business Model: Recent Developments and Future Research. Journal of Management, 37(4): 1019-1042.
Xu, X., Lu, Y., Vogel-Heuser, B. & Wan, L. (2021). Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—Inception, conception and perception. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. 61: 530–535.
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
On submission authors agree to share 50% copyright with Action Learning, Action Research Association Ltd (ALARA). On receipt of payment for public access to papers authors who are members of ALARA will receive 50% of the fee. The remaining 50% will be returned to ALARA.
ALARA is publishing both a hard copy and an electronic copy. There may be a delay in receiving the hard copy, as it is printed by an external print-on-demand publisher.
